We really, really wanted to like this movie. Its a film (an artform) about wine. And its about the wine making process, also an art. What could be better to review on ArtandHunger.com? We always encourage films about food or wine. Food plays a central role in some of the best books and films: Hamsun's Hunger (1890), Big Night (1996), Babette's Feast (1987) and The Joy Luck Club (1993), to name a few. But there have been few films featuring wine.
"Bottle Shock," a new film directed by Randy Miller, follows in the footsteps of "Sideways," that much-admired film in which Pinot Noir is a member of the cast. "Bottle Shock" was the official selection at the Sundance Film Festival this year, and was received with a standing ovation. In addition, the film tells the triumphant, rabble-rousing story of the first artisan California vineyards who toppled French domination of the Wine Industry in what is now called the 1976 "Judgement of Paris." The scenery in the film, set in gorgeous, golden Napa Valley, is stunning. The soundtrack is fantastic. Plus, Bottle Shock contains Dennis Farina, and we'll watch anything with Dennis Farina. But despite all the attractive trappings, and as much as we wanted to, we could not bring ourselves to like this film.
The film's weaknesses are partly the fault of the Director, partly the Screenwriter. Rachel Taylor as Sam is just eye candy. Her artificial performance in which she hops around quoting Hemingway and kissing men is obviously inserted into the story just to satisfy Hollywood producers who required a sex scene. While pretty, she is not convincing as a wine devotee.
Her two young friends, Bo Barrett and Gustavo are also unbelievable, star Chris Pine looks like he is not a hippie but wearing a wig to look like one throughout the whole film. Freddy Rodriguez's performance as Gustavo is better, although his rage in certain scenes seems fake and his over-orchestrated love scene with the girl, in a conveniently quaint shack that has no screens on the windows, rings false. Bill Pullman gave the best performance as Jim, but his scenes feel rushed, like the director is trying to cram in too much emotion, too much history and too many intricacies of Jim's relationships, into a short amount of film.
The film's dialogue seems forced, the characters always speak to one another in snappy, over-written phrases and quote Galileo at the drop of a hat. No one talks like that. Even in "Sideways," a film about lofty topics, the dialogue felt real. The events in "Bottle Shock" seem false. Even if they may have actually happened to real life vineyard owner, Jim Barrett, the way they are filmed and the pace of the scenes makes it all seem fictional.
The best thing about the film is it is an easy breezy wine history lesson that quickly teaches you some trivia about wine, such as what "bottle shock" is. We recommend it just for that, if you really don't have anything else to do on a Friday night. But you are better off learning the real history of American wines like Napa's Stag Leap Cabernet and Chateau Montellena's Chardonnay by visiting and taking a tour of Napa Valley. Then you would get to see the scenery in person.















